What Claude Sonnet 5.5 is
Claude Sonnet 5.5 is a cloud API model for general coding and knowledge work, including structured extraction. It accepts text and image inputs and returns text. It can be used through an application or an eligible Claude surface, but the surrounding product determines the available tools and file workflows.
It is an editorial starting point for a range of ordinary work, not a measured winner in this directory. A model that interprets a quote or drafts a change should still be paired with deterministic checks where possible, such as spreadsheet formulas or a software acceptance test.
Read the official documentationHow it fits into a workflow
The supplier-comparison workshop illustrates this division of labor: the model interprets quote notes, while formulas calculate totals from preserved inputs. Changing one shipping amount tests whether the workbook really recalculates. The fixture is fictional and the recipe was not run end to end, so it is a useful evaluation design rather than a product success claim.
Examples described as illustrative or proposed trials are editorial suggestions. Documented real builds, when available, are linked separately below.
Requirements, cost and limitations
The documentation lists a 1M-token context and 128K ordinary output limit; tokens are units of text processing, not documents or pages. Migration details include model-specific thinking behavior and unsupported sampling parameters such as temperature. Check current model access and pricing before adapting an older integration.
Check current access and pricingWhen to choose it and what to compare
Start with the task rather than an assumed family hierarchy. Haiku may be worth evaluating for short classification or extraction; Opus may be worth evaluating for more complex work. Compare correctness, revisions and total usage on the same examples instead of selecting solely by model size or name.
Technical details and documented capabilities
These details come from the linked sources, checked 2026-10-27. Open the current documentation before planning a deployment or migration.
- Type
- Cloud API models
- Runs on / through
- Claude API and documented partner platforms
- Execution choices
- cloud
- License or access terms
- Commercial cloud service terms
- Documented 1M-token context and 128K ordinary output limit.
- Model-specific behavior, migration notes and limits are documented.
Access, running cost and practical requirements
Frontier hosted candidate — editorial selection. How we use this label.
Claude API and the documented cloud partner platforms; also a selectable Claude model where the plan allows. Exact plan-by-model entitlement matrix was not independently established.
Developer API prices
- Billing route
- Claude API base
- Units
- USD per one million tokens
- Input
- $2
- Cached input
- $0.1
- Output
- $10
- 5-minute cache write
- $2.5
- 1-hour cache write
- $4
Batch input/output discounted 50%; tool/platform charges separate.
API prices are not a chat subscription price. A token is a unit of processed text; images and other inputs have their own token accounting. Repeated history, reasoning output and tools can change the final bill. A subscription may offer separately claimed credits, subject to its terms.
Understand subscriptions, API billing and creditsAPI input, output and context specifications
- API model ID
- claude-sonnet-5-5
- Input
- text, image
- Output
- text
- Published context ceiling
- 1,000,000
- Default maximum output
- 128,000
Product interfaces and their defaults can differ from the API ceiling. A long context limit is not a guarantee that the model reliably uses every detail.
What the configuration changes
Provider positions it for everyday bounded work and faster iteration rather than sustained open-ended judgment.
API default effort high; documented app default medium, so defaults are not interchangeable.
Do not set thinking disabled: use between_tools to suppress upfront thinking. Forced tool use is also rejected.
Provider says Opus remains stronger for complex open-ended work despite some favorable Sonnet benchmark scores.
Benchmark evidence and what it means
These are selected source-reported observations, not a league table. Task, version, tool access, reasoning budget and test harness all affect a result. A historical score does not establish current leadership or accuracy on your own work.
FrontierCode 1.1 Main
- Reported result
- 52.1 percent
- Model / checkpoint
- Claude Sonnet 5.5
- Evidence
- Anthropic — publisher-reported, not tested by PrisAIm
- Date
- Source publication: 2026-09-28
- Conditions
- xhigh effort. The same launch table reports 46.2% at max, illustrating that more effort is not guaranteed to improve a result. Harness details require linked system card.
Sources and evidence
Product facts are based on the following published sources, checked 2026-10-27. Workflow suggestions and comparisons are editorial interpretation; PrisAIm has not independently benchmarked this product.
Official model overview and specifications Official pricing